Does the limit lim_(x rarr oo) e^x/x^2 rarr oo exist? If so evaluate it.

2 Answers
Sep 30, 2017

+oo

Explanation:

The simple explanation is that the e^x function increases much faster than the x^2 function, so as we reach arbitrarily large positive x, the numerator will become orders of magnitude larger than the denominator.

The slightly more complex method is L'HOPITAL'S RULE, which states that lim_(x->n)f(x)/g(x) = lim_(x->n)(f'(x))/(g'(x)). This can be extended to higher order derivatives, such as second order (e.g. (f''(x))/(g''(x), etc.

The derivative of the numerator is simply e^x; same for the second derivative, the third, etc. The derivative of x^2 is 2x, and the second order derivative is 2.

Using this, we can find...

lim_(x->+oo)e^x/x^2 = lim_(x->+oo)e^x/(2x) = lim_(x->+oo)e^x/2 = e^oo/2 = oo

Since we know this limit is simply +oo for the second derivative, it is also true for the first derivative and the original function.

Sep 30, 2017

lim_(x rarr oo) e^x/x^2 rarr oo

Explanation:

If we look at the power series (Maclaurin Series) for e^x we have:

e^x = 1 + x + (x^2)/(2!) + (x^3)/(3!) + (x^4)/(4!) + (x^5)/(5!) + ...

Dividing by x^2, we get:

e^x/x^2 = 1/x^2{1 + x + (x^2)/(2!) + (x^3)/(3!) + (x^4)/(4!) + (x^5)/(5!) + ... }
\ \ \ \ \ = 1/x^2 + 1/x + 1/(2!) + (x)/(3!) + (x^2)/(4!) + (x^3)/(5!) + ...

Now, if we take the limit as x rarr oo, we have:

lim_(x rarr oo) e^x/x^2 = lim_(x rarr oo){1/x^2 + 1/x + 1/(2!) + (x)/(3!) + (x^2)/(4!) + ... }

Clearly the first two terms vanish as x rarr oo, leaving

lim_(x rarr oo) e^x/x^2 = lim_(x rarr oo){ 1/(2!) + {x)/(3!) + (x^2)/(4!) + (x^3)/(5!) + ... }

And for large x, each term increase without bound, and so therefore does the sum of those unbound terms, thus:

lim_(x rarr oo) e^x/x^2 rarr oo