Calculate the pH of a 0.10 M H_3PO_4H3PO4 solution that is also 0.0005 M (NH_4)_3PO_4(NH4)3PO4?

K_(a_1)=1.0xx10^-6Ka1=1.0×106
K_(a_2)=1.0xx10^-8Ka2=1.0×108
K_(a_3)=1.0xx10^-10Ka3=1.0×1010


Reactions used:

  1. H_3PO_4(aq)+H_2O(l)\rightleftharpoonsH_3O^+(aq)+H_2PO_4^(-)(aq)H3PO4(aq)+H2O(l)H3O+(aq)+H2PO4(aq)
  2. H_2PO_4^(-)(aq)+H_2O(l)\rightleftharpoonsH_3O^+(aq)+HPO_4^(2-)(aq)H2PO4(aq)+H2O(l)H3O+(aq)+HPO24(aq)
  3. HPO_4^(2-)(aq)+H_2O(l)\rightleftharpoonsH_3O^+(aq)+PO_4^(3-)(aq)HPO24(aq)+H2O(l)H3O+(aq)+PO34(aq)

We are asked to use an ICE table at least once.

2 Answers
Jun 27, 2018

Unfortunately, these K_aKa values are not real; the actual values are:

K_(a1) = 7.5 xx 10^(-3)Ka1=7.5×103
K_(a2) = 6.3 xx 10^(-8)Ka2=6.3×108
K_(a3) = 4.5 xx 10^(-13)Ka3=4.5×1013

The magnitude of K_(a3)Ka3 suggests that we can ignore it, so let's just focus on the first two.

When I do that, I get "0.0274 M H"_3"O"^(+)0.0274 M H3O+ and "pH" ~~ 1.57pH1.57 when assuming that "PO"_4^(3-)PO34 reasonably associates in water to be mostly in the form of "HPO"_4^(2-)HPO24, forming the monohydrogen phosphate common ion.

Apparently, the salt was enough to negate the second dissociation.


DISCLAIMER: REALLY LONG ANSWER!

The "0.0005 M"0.0005 M ("NH"_4)_3"PO"_4(NH4)3PO4 contributes the phosphate ion as the initial concentration. But we first have to find out how much "HPO"_4^(2-)HPO24 it contributes as the common ion.

"PO"_4^(3-)(aq) + "H"_2"O"(l) rightleftharpoons "HPO"_4^(2-)(aq) + "OH"^(-)(aq)PO34(aq)+H2O(l)HPO24(aq)+OH(aq)

"I"" "0.0005" "" "" "" "-" "" "" "0" "" "" "" "0I 0.0005 0 0
"C"" "-x" "" "" "" "" "-" "" "+x" "" "" "+xC x +x +x
"E"" "0.0005-x" "" "-" "" "" "x" "" "" "" "xE 0.0005x x x

This has K_(b1) = K_w/(K_(a3)) = (10^(-14))/(4.5 xx 10^(-13)) = 0.0222Kb1=KwKa3=10144.5×1013=0.0222, which is quite non-negligible, meaning that the reaction goes to near-completion.

K_(b1)Kb1 is large compared to 0.00050.0005, so we assume that from the salt, we get ["HPO"_4^(2-)]_(eq) ~~ ["PO"_4^(3-)]_i = "0.0005 M"[HPO24]eq[PO34]i=0.0005 M.

(In actuality, it is "0.000489 M"0.000489 M, only 2.25%2.25% error.)

The first... actual acid ICE table is:

"H"_3"PO"_4(aq) + "H"_2"O"(l) rightleftharpoons "H"_3"O"^(+)(aq) + "H"_2"PO"_4^(-)(aq)H3PO4(aq)+H2O(l)H3O+(aq)+H2PO4(aq)

"I"" "0.10" "" "" "" "-" "" "" "0" "" "" "" "" "0I 0.10 0 0
"C"" "-x" "" "" "" "-" "" "+x" "" "" "" "+xC x +x +x
"E"" "0.10-x" "" "-" "" "" "x" "" "" "" "" "xE 0.10x x x

The first K_(a)Ka then gives:

7.5 xx 10^(-3) = (["H"_3"O"^(+)]["H"_2"PO"_4^(-)])/(["H"_3"PO"_4])7.5×103=[H3O+][H2PO4][H3PO4]

= (x^2)/(0.10-x)=x20.10x

The small xx approximation would have given:

= x^2/(0.10)=x20.10

=> x = sqrt(0.10 cdot 7.5 xx 10^(-3)) = "0.0274 M"x=0.107.5×103=0.0274 M

That is the first ["H"_3"O"^(+)][H3O+], which we will use in the next dissociation:

["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(eq1) ~~ "0.0274 M" = ["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(i2)[H3O+]eq10.0274 M=[H3O+]i2

["H"_2"PO"_4^(-)]_(eq1) ~~ "0.0274 M" -= ["H"_2"PO"_4]_(i2)[H2PO4]eq10.0274 M[H2PO4]i2

["H"_3"PO"_4]_(eq1) ~~ "0.0726 M"[H3PO4]eq10.0726 M

So now, we have the second ICE table, already accounting for the "PO"_4^(3-)PO34 from ("NH"_4)_3"PO"_4(NH4)3PO4 associating in water:

"H"_2"PO"_4^(-)(aq) + "H"_2"O"(l) rightleftharpoons "H"_3"O"^(+)(aq) + "HPO"_4^(2-)(aq)H2PO4(aq)+H2O(l)H3O+(aq)+HPO24(aq)

"I"" "0.0274" "" "" "-" "" "" "0.0274" "" "" "0.0005I 0.0274 0.0274 0.0005
"C"" "-x" "" "" "" "-" "" "" "+x" "" "" "+xC x +x +x
"E"" "0.0274-x" "-" "" "" "0.0274+x" "0.0005+xE 0.0274x 0.0274+x 0.0005+x

Now, the cumulative "H"_3"O"^(+)H3O+ would be the solution we would get for ["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(eq)[H3O+]eq here, i.e.

["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(eq) = ["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(eq1) + x[H3O+]eq=[H3O+]eq1+x

Set up the second K_aKa expression:

6.3 xx 10^(-8) = (["H"_3"O"^(+)]["HPO"_4^(2-)])/(["H"_2"PO"_4^(-)])6.3×108=[H3O+][HPO24][H2PO4]

= ((0.0274+x)(0.0005+x))/(0.0274-x)=(0.0274+x)(0.0005+x)0.0274x

In this case, since K_(a2)Ka2 "<<"<< 0.02740.0274, we can definitely use the small xx approximation here. This gives:

6.3 xx 10^(-8) = ((0.0274cancel(+x)^"small")(0.0005+x))/(0.0274cancel(-x)^"small")

~~ 0.0005 + x

Therefore,

x ~~ -"0.0005 M"

Apparently, the salt is enough to reverse the direction of this reaction.

color(blue)(["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(eq)) = ["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(eq1) + ["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(eq2)

= "0.0274 M" + (-"0.0005 M")

~~ color(blue)("0.0269 M")

So, the "pH" is:

"pH" = -log["H"_3"O"^(+)]_(eq) = color(blue)(1.57)

Jul 3, 2018

This is using the K_a's given by the problem. Just wanted to check my work.

Explanation:

Following the same ICE tables as the answer above (? I will check to make sure. If they don't match, I will upload a picture of my work asap)


  1. derived from table 1, K_(a_1)=1.0xx10^-6=(x*x)/(0.10-x)
    x^2\cong(1.0xx10^-6)(0.10)
    x=\approx3.2xx10^-4 M
  2. derived from table 2, K_(a_2)=1.0xx10^-8=(x(0.00032+x))/(0.00032-x)
    x\cong((1.0xx10^-8)(\cancel(0.00032)))/(\cancel(0.00032))
    x\rArr1.0xx10^-8 M
  3. table 3 with K_(a_3) calculates x=0, so negligible.

    Finding pH:
    [H^+]_(\text(total))=0.0032+0.00032001=0.00064001 M
    which is 6.4xx10^-4 M of [H^+]
    pH is -log[H^+]=-log(6.4xx10^-4)\approx3.19