Calculate E_(cell)Ecell for: Mg(s)|Mg^(2+)(0.25M)||Zn^(2+)(0.10M)|Zn(s)Mg(s)Mg2+(0.25M)Zn2+(0.10M)Zn(s)?

Mg(s)|Mg^(2+)(0.25M)||Zn^(2+)(0.10M)|Zn(s)Mg(s)Mg2+(0.25M)Zn2+(0.10M)Zn(s)

Half-reactions
Mg(s)\toMg^(2+)(aq)+2e^(-)Mg(s)Mg2+(aq)+2e
Zn^(2+)+2e^(-)\toZn(s)Zn2++2eZn(s)

Combined
Mg(s)+Zn^(2+)(aq)\rightleftharpoonsMg^(2+)(aq)+Zn(s)Mg(s)+Zn2+(aq)Mg2+(aq)+Zn(s)

Formula
E_(cell)=E°_(cell)-0.0592/nV\log(Q)

My notes say this:

E_(cell)=1.598V (???)
E°_(cell)=2.372V+(-0.762V) (???)

and Q=([Mg^(2+)])/([Zn^(2+)])=0.25/0.10 (this, I understand.)

1 Answer
Jul 13, 2018

E_(cell) = "1.598 V"

for these nonstandard concentrations. How do you change only the concentrations to force E_(cell) = E_(cell)^@?


Typically (in the US, anyway), the anode is placed first and the cathode is placed second in cell notation so that electrons flow from left to right.

overbrace("Mg"(s) | "Mg"^(2+)("0.25 M"))^"Anode"||overbrace("Zn"^(2+)("0.10 M")|"Zn"(s))^"Cathode"

So the half-reactions are:

-("Mg"^(2+)(aq) + cancel(2e^(-)) -> "Mg"(s)), " "-(E_(red)^@) = -(-"2.372 V")
ul("Zn"^(2+)(aq) + cancel(2e^(-)) -> "Zn"(s), " "E_(red)^@ = -"0.762 V")
"Mg"(s) + "Zn"^(2+)(aq) -> "Mg"^(2+)(aq) + "Zn"(s), " "E_(cell)^@ = ???

These E_(red)^@ were both negative, because they would react with "HCl" (i.e. their reduction potentials being more negative means the metals prefer to be oxidized compared to the standard hydrogen electrode half-reaction, which "HCl" is based on).

The Nernst equation for the cell potential E_(cell) is:

E_(cell) = E_(cell)^@ - (RT)/(nF)lnQ

where:

  • R = "8.314 V"cdot"C/mol"cdot"K" is the universal gas constant.
  • T is temperature in "K".
  • n is the mols of electrons PER mol of atom.
  • F = "96485 C/mol e"^(-) is the Faraday constant.
  • Q is the reaction quotient for when E_(cell) ne 0 (i.e. non-equilibrium).

You have a different version because you seem to be using T = "298.15 K" by default.

-("8.314 V"cdot"C/mol"cdot"K" cdot "298.15 K")/(n cdot "96485 C/mol e"^(-))cdot underbrace(lnQ)_(2.303logQ)

~~ -"0.0592 V"/nlogQ

You have switched the sign on E_(red)^@ for "Mg" because it gets oxidized in this reaction more favorably compared to zinc, as the E_(red)^@ (-"2.372 V") is more negative.

In general,

E_(cell)^@ = E_(red)^@ + E_(o x)^@

where E_(o x)^@ is simply the opposite sign to the E_(red)^@ value for the corresponding reduction reaction after it has been reversed.

A trick I do is take the more positive (less negative) value and subtract out the less positive (more negative) value to determine the spontaneous reaction direction.

Compare the two ways to do this:

color(blue)(E_(cell)^@) = -"0.762 V" - (-"2.372 V")

= overbrace(E_("cathode")^@)^(-"0.762 V") - overbrace(E_("anode")^@)^(-"2.372 V")

= overbrace(E_(red)^@)^(-"0.762 V") + overbrace(E_(o x)^@)^(+"2.372 V")

= color(blue)(+"1.610 V")

This suggests that our initial assumption was correct, that zinc gets reduced and magnesium gets oxidized. So, the reaction direction is right, and

Q = (["Mg"^(2+)])/(["Zn"^(2+)]) = "0.25 M"/"0.10 M" = 2.5

Therefore,

color(blue)(E_(cell)) = "1.610 V" - "0.0592 V"/("2 mol e"^(-)"/1 mol Zn")log(2.5)

= color(blue)(+"1.598 V")