Question #d4b30

1 Answer
Feb 26, 2015

Set up two simple equations then solve like you would any two-equation system.

Explanation:

You only have two isotopes, which means that the sum of their respective abundances will amount to 100%, or to 1 if you use fractional numbers.

Let's say the abundance of ""_3^6Li63Li is "A"A and the abundance of ""_3^7Li73Li is "B"B. To determine these abundances set up two simple equations (I'll use fractional numbers - you'll sometimes see this expressed as decimal abundance)

A + B = 1A+B=1, and

6.0151 * A + 7.0160 * B = 6.9416.0151A+7.0160B=6.941

Now solve this like you would any two-equation system.

A = 1- B => 6.0151 * (1 - B) + 7.0160 * B = 6.941A=1B6.0151(1B)+7.0160B=6.941

6.0151 - 6.0151 * B + 7.0160 * B = 6.9416.01516.0151B+7.0160B=6.941

This will get you

1.0009 * B = 0.9259 => B = 0.925071.0009B=0.9259B=0.92507

Plug this into the first equation to get

A = 1 - B = 1 - 0.92507 = 0.07493A=1B=10.92507=0.07493

Expressed in percentages and rounded to four sig figs, these values will be

A = 7.490%A=7.490% - the abundance of ""_3^6Li63Li
B = 92.51%B=92.51% - the abundance of ""_3^7Li"73Li

Finally, check the result to see if it makes sense. Notice that the average atomic mass of the two isotopes is 6.941, which is closer to 7.0160, the atomic mass of the heavier isotope, ""_3^7Li73Li, than it is to 6.0151, the atomic mass of the lighter one.

This means that the heavier isotope is much more abundant than the other, which is confirmed by the abundaces we got - 92.5% for the heavier one and only 7.49% for the lighter isotope.