If heat goes into a liquid, do I need to care about the work done on the liquid? Aren't they incompressible?
1 Answer
Sure. It's small, but when you only have solids and liquids, it is not negligible in the big picture.
(When you have a gas involved though, the work done is considerably more significant than the work done on liquids and solids at the same applied external pressure.)
Consider
Although the heat flow
#"L"/"997.0479 g" xx "18.015 g"/"1 mol water"#
#=# #"0.018068 L/mol"#
A realistic new molar volume for the water after expansion and heating to
#color(blue)(w) = -PDeltaV = -P(V_2 - V_1)#
#= -("1 atm")("0.018095 L"/"mol" - "0.018068 L"/"mol")("1 mol water") xx "8.314472 J"/("0.082057 L"cdot"atm")#
#= color(blue)(-"0.002736 J")# of work.
(And back-calculating shows the new density would be
That is evidently an extremely small amount of work for a
For instance,
#V_1 = (nRT_1)/P = (("1 mol")("0.082057 L"cdot"atm/mol"cdot"K")("298.15 K"))/("1 atm")#
#=# #"24.4653 L"#
#V_2 = (nRT_2)/P = (("1 mol")("0.082057 L"cdot"atm/mol"cdot"K")("303.15 K"))/("1 atm")#
#=# #"24.8756 L"#
#color(green)(DeltaV_"gas") = V_2 - V_1 = color(green)("0.4103 L")#
compared to liquid water, which had
The change in volume was over 15000 times as significant for a gas as for a liquid.