If heat goes into a liquid, do I need to care about the work done on the liquid? Aren't they incompressible?

1 Answer
Nov 28, 2016

Sure. It's small, but when you only have solids and liquids, it is not negligible in the big picture.

(When you have a gas involved though, the work done is considerably more significant than the work done on liquids and solids at the same applied external pressure.)


Consider #"1 mol"# of liquid water in a closed system where we've reversibly heated it at #"1 atm"# of atmospheric pressure from #25^@ "C"# to #30^@ "C"#.

Although the heat flow #q# is nonneglible (around #"376 J"#), let's consider the work done. The molar volume of water at #25^@ "C"# is:

#"L"/"997.0479 g" xx "18.015 g"/"1 mol water"#

#=# #"0.018068 L/mol"#

A realistic new molar volume for the water after expansion and heating to #30^@ "C"# would be #"0.018095 L/mol"#. It would mean that the expansion work required was:

#color(blue)(w) = -PDeltaV = -P(V_2 - V_1)#

#= -("1 atm")("0.018095 L"/"mol" - "0.018068 L"/"mol")("1 mol water") xx "8.314472 J"/("0.082057 L"cdot"atm")#

#= color(blue)(-"0.002736 J")# of work.

(And back-calculating shows the new density would be #"995.5789 g/L"#, which is approximately the water density near #30^@ "C"#.)

That is evidently an extremely small amount of work for a #5^@ "C"# temperature change, compared to an ideal gas.

For instance, #"1 mol"# of an ideal gas being expanded from #25^@ "C"# to #30^@ "C"# would have the following change in volume at #"1 atm"# atmospheric pressure:

#V_1 = (nRT_1)/P = (("1 mol")("0.082057 L"cdot"atm/mol"cdot"K")("298.15 K"))/("1 atm")#

#=# #"24.4653 L"#

#V_2 = (nRT_2)/P = (("1 mol")("0.082057 L"cdot"atm/mol"cdot"K")("303.15 K"))/("1 atm")#

#=# #"24.8756 L"#

#color(green)(DeltaV_"gas") = V_2 - V_1 = color(green)("0.4103 L")#

compared to liquid water, which had #color(green)(DeltaV_"liq" = "0.000027 L")#.

The change in volume was over 15000 times as significant for a gas as for a liquid.