And what we know for chemical reactions is that "mass" and "charge" are conserved. But for this "NUCULAR" reaction, "MASS" may not be conserved.
And thus we may write the alpha"-particle" decay of ""^(238)U (the "92" subscript described in the question is superfluous, why?).
"(i)" ""^238U rarr ""^234Th +""^4He
And for "(ii)" we have a "de jure" chemical reaction, when fluorine gas, the most reactive element on the Periodic Table, oxidizes uranium metal.
"(ii)" U(s) +3F_2(g) rarr UF_6(s)
Historically, reaction (ii) is significant, in that the product UF_6 is reasonably volatile. Thus this enables some means to separate the isotopomeric uranium products as their volatile fluorides. I do not think ""^238U is fissile, but for better info you should consult a text.