What is the change in volume for the reaction of "16 g CH"_416 g CH4 and "16 g O"_216 g O2 at 700^@ "C"700C and "1 bar"1 bar? The reaction is "CH"_4(g) + 1/2"O"_2(g) -> "CO"(g) + 2"H"_2(g)CH4(g)+12O2(g)CO(g)+2H2(g).

1 Answer
Apr 11, 2017

About "120 L"120 L.


For this, since we are asked for the change in volume, it is necessary to solve for the molar volume of an ideal gas at 700^@ "C"700C (since it is evidently not 0^@ "C"0C like it would be for STP).

PV = nRTPV=nRT

=> V/n = (RT)/PVn=RTP

= (("0.083145 L"cdot"bar/mol"cdot"K")("700+273.15 K"))/("1 bar")=(0.083145 Lbar/molK)(700+273.15 K)1 bar

== "80.91 L/mol"80.91 L/mol

Given "16 g"16 g of both methane and diatomic oxygen, we can then find their "mol"mols.

"16 g CH"_4 xx ("1 mol CH"_4)/(12.011 + 4 xx 1.0079 "g CH"_4) = "0.9973 mols CH"_416 g CH4×1 mol CH412.011+4×1.0079g CH4=0.9973 mols CH4

"16 g O"_2 xx ("1 mol O"_2)/(15.999 xx 2 "g O"_2) = "0.5000 mols O"_216 g O2×1 mol O215.999×2g O2=0.5000 mols O2

No, it is not necessary to halve anything. You have from the masses the same mol/mol ratio as required in the reaction itself. You needed "1 mol CH"_4(g)1 mol CH4(g) for every "0.5 mol O"_2(g)0.5 mol O2(g), and that's what you have, basically.

You do have a bit extra "O"_2O2 than you need, though, so let's just be particular about it... The limiting reactant is "CH"_4CH4, since there is slightly less than twice the mols of "CH"_4CH4 as "O"_2O2, when the reaction requires exactly twice.

So:

"0.9973 mols CH"_4 harr "0.4987 mols O"_20.9973 mols CH40.4987 mols O2

and "0.0130 mols O"_20.0130 mols O2 is in excess. That will remain, but we have to account for that in calculating the mols of the products by using "CH"_4CH4 instead of "O"_2O2 to calculate the mols of products.

By the mol/mol ratio given in the reaction:

"mols CH"_4 harr "0.9973 mols CO"(g)mols CH40.9973 mols CO(g)

"mols CH"_4 xx 2 harr "1.9947 mols H"_2(g)mols CH4×21.9947 mols H2(g)

So, really the next thing we can calculate are the final and initial mols:

n_(CO) + n_(H_2) = n_2nCO+nH2=n2

n_(CH_4) + n_(O_2) = n_1nCH4+nO2=n1

=> "0.9973 mols CO" + "1.9947 mols H"_2 = n_2 = "2.9920 mols gas"0.9973 mols CO+1.9947 mols H2=n2=2.9920 mols gas

=> "0.9973 mols CH"_4 + "(0.4987 + 0.0130) mols O"_2 = n_1 = "1.5090 mols gas"0.9973 mols CH4+(0.4987 + 0.0130) mols O2=n1=1.5090 mols gas

That means the ratio of the mols can be related for a big picture using Gay-Lussac's Law:

V_1/(n_1) = V_2/(n_2)V1n1=V2n2

V_1/("1.5090 mols") = V_2/("2.9920 mols")V11.5090 mols=V22.9920 mols

By the molar volume, we can find each actual volume for the ideal gas combinations.

V_1/"1.5090 mols" = "80.91 L"/"mol"V11.5090 mols=80.91 Lmol

=> V_1 = "122.093 L"V1=122.093 L

V_2/"2.9920 mols" = "80.91 L"/"mol"V22.9920 mols=80.91 Lmol

=> V_2 = "242.083 L"V2=242.083 L

So, the change in volume is then:

bb(DeltaV = V_2 - V_1)

= "242.083 L" - "122.093 L"

= bb"119.99 L"

To two sig figs, color(blue)(DeltaV = "120 L").

As a check, we can see whether the ideal gas law is still satisfied.

PDeltaV stackrel(?" ")(=)DeltanRT

("1 bar")("120 L") stackrel(?" ")(=) ("2.9920 - 1.5090 mols gas")("0.083145 L"cdot"bar/mol"cdot"K")("973.15 K")

"120 L"cdot"bar" ~~ "119.993 L"cdot"bar"

Yep, we're good.