Question #4b856

1 Answer
Apr 25, 2017

enter image source here

I think we have to model these as charged conducting spheres so the charges are at the surface as shown .

Gauss' Law tells us that:

int int_S mathbf E cdot d mathbf S = (sum Q_(enc))/epsilon_oSEdS=Qencεo

And by using a concentric Gaussian sphere, we can say of a general sphere of radius rr that:

mathbf E = (sum Q_(enc))/( 4 pi epsilon_o r^2)E=Qenc4πεor2

For these conducting spheres, we have 2 different situations:

  • inside the sphere, sum Q_(enc) = 0Qenc=0 so mathbf E = mathbf 0E=0

  • oustide the sphere, sum Q_(enc) = QQenc=Q so mathbf E = ( Q)/( 4 pi epsilon_o r^2) mathbf e_rE=Q4πεor2er

We connect electric field mathbf EE to potential via mathbf E = - nabla VE=V, which simplifies due to symmetry to mathbf E= - (partial V)/(partial r) mathbf e_rE=Vrer.

So we get these results:

  • inside the sphere, mathbf E = mathbf 0 implies V = " const"E=0V= const

  • outside the sphere, sum Q_(enc) = QQenc=Q so mathbf E = ( Q)/( 4 pi epsilon_o r^2) mathbf e_r implies V = ( Q)/( 4 pi epsilon_o r) E=Q4πεor2erV=Q4πεor

Because we know VV to be constant within the sphere, we can say that, at the surface and inside each of the initial waterdrops we have potential as follows:

V_1 = = ( Q_1)/( 4 pi epsilon_o R_1) V1==Q14πεoR1

Conservation of charge tells us that Q_2 = 2 Q_1Q2=2Q1. Conservation of matter (volume) tells us that: R_2 = root3(2) R_1 approx 1.26 R_1R2=32R11.26R1.

So we can say that:

V_2 = ( Q_2)/( 4 pi epsilon_o R_2) V2=Q24πεoR2

= ( 2 Q_1)/( root3(2) \ 4 pi epsilon_o R_1)

= root3(4) V_1

= root3(4) cdot 250 " V" approx 397 " V"