Cylindrical shells (parts in details)?

  1. f(x)=x^2f(x)=x2, y=0y=0, x=1x=1
    Set up a volume (shell) derivative based on the following axes of rotation:
    (A) around x=-2x=2
    (B) around x=2x=2
    (C) around y=-2y=2
    (D) around y=2y=2

  2. Can you use washers for (A) and (B) in the previous question? Why or why not?

  3. "Pikachu claims that no matter what kind of problem, you can always use disks/washers and shells. Is this true? Explain."

2 Answers
Feb 21, 2018

I have some parts of this question answered; feel free to check/change where needed

Explanation:


Here are my answers for number 1**
a=0a=0 and b=1b=1;
(A)
\int_0^1[2\pi(x-(-2))(x^2)]dx=2\pi\int_0^1[(x+2)(x^2)]dx10[2π(x(2))(x2)]dx=2π10[(x+2)(x2)]dx

(B)
\int_0^1[2\pi(2-x)(x^2)]dx=2\pi\int_0^1[(2-x)(x^2)]dx10[2π(2x)(x2)]dx=2π10[(2x)(x2)]dx

(C)
\int_0^1[2\pi(y-(-2))(1-\sqrt{y})]dy=2\pi\int_0^1[(y+2)(1-\sqrt{y})]dy10[2π(y(2))(1y)]dy=2π10[(y+2)(1y)]dy

(D)
\int_0^1[2\pi(2-y)(1-\sqrt{y})]dy=2\pi\int_0^1[(2-y)(1-y)]dy10[2π(2y)(1y)]dy=2π10[(2y)(1y)]dy

Feb 22, 2018

For attempted answers to questions 2 and 3. please see below.

Explanation:

  1. (A)
    Shells: V = 2piint_0^1 (x+2)x^2 dx = (11pi)/6V=2π10(x+2)x2dx=11π6

Washers: V = pi int_0^1 (9-(sqrty+2)^2) dy = (11pi)/6V=π10(9(y+2)2)dy=11π6

(B)
Shells: int_0^1 (2-x)x^2 dx = 5/6pi10(2x)x2dx=56π

Washers: pi int_0^1 ((2-sqrty)^2 - 1)dy = 5/6piπ10((2y)21)dy=56π

3.
Obviously Pikachu is not correct. You cannot use discs/washers or shells to solve a related rates problem.

In theory, for any solid of revolution, we can use either. But consider the following problem.

Find the volume that results if the region bounded by the curve y = xsinxy=xsinx and the xx-axis from the origin to x=pix=π is rotated about the yy-axis..

graph{xsinx [-1.456, 4.702, -0.76, 2.318]}

Using shells, this is pi int_0^pi x^2sinx dx = pi^2 -4ππ0x2sinxdx=π24

To use washers we need expressions for the xx values on the left and right in terms of yy.

Since y = xsinxy=xsinx cannot be solved using standard mathematical functions, our best hope would probably be to find a series approximation to the inverse function. (I think that one exists.)
So we could do it using washers (maybe), but we sure wouldn't want to.