Given f(x) = cosh(x+a/cosh(x+a/cosh( cdots)))f(x)=coshx+acosh(x+acosh()) and g(x)g(x) its inverse, what is the minimum distance between then for a > 0a>0?

2 Answers
May 8, 2018

We seek the minimum distance between the function:

f(x) = cosh(x+a/cosh(x+a/cosh( x+a/cosh(cdots))) ) f(x)=cosh⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜x+acosh(x+acosh(x+acosh()))⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟

and its inverse, for a gt 0a>0

Let, y=f(x)y=f(x), Then we can write this repeated recursive function definition concisely as:

y = cosh(x+a/y ) = coshwy=cosh(x+ay)=coshw, say where w=x+a/yw=x+ay

Now, we attempt to find the inverse function, f^(-1)(x)f1(x). Using the definition of the hyperbolic cosine:

cosh w = (e^w+e^-w)/2 coshw=ew+ew2

so then:

y = coshw = (e^w+e^-w)/2 y=coshw=ew+ew2

:. 2y = e^w+e^-w

:. 2ye^w = e^(2w)+1

:. e^(2w) -2ye^w + 1 = 0

:. (e^(w) -y)^2 - y^2+1= 0

:. (e^(w) -y)^2 = y^2-1

:. e^(w) -y = +-sqrt(y^2-1)

:. e^(w) = y +-sqrt(y^2-1)

:. w = ln(y +-sqrt(y^2-1))

:. x+a/y = ln(y +-sqrt(y^2-1))

:. x = ln(y +-sqrt(y^2-1)) -a/y

Therefore although we cannot write an exact function for the original repeated recursive function, f(x), we can write an exact form for its inverse, f^(-1)(x)

:. f^(-1)(x) = ln(x +-sqrt(x^2-1)) -a/x

In order to minimize the distance between any function and its inverse, which are reflection in the line y=x, we can reduce the problem to that of minimizing the distance, D, say, between either function and y=x, then the distance we seek is 2D.

Now, the distance from the point (p,q) and the line Ax+By+C=0 is given by:

D = |Ap+Bq+C|/sqrt(A^2+B^2)

So, we can find the distance between a generic coordinate (x,f^(-1)(x)) on f^(-1)(x) and y=x (or x-y=0), using:

D = |-x+ln(x +-sqrt(x^2-1)) -a/x|/sqrt(1^2+(-1)^2)

:. 2D^2 = ln(x +-sqrt(x^2-1)) -a/x - x

Differentiating wrt x, we have:

4(dD)/(dx) = ( 1+- x/sqrt(x^2-1) )/(x +-sqrt(x^2-1))+1/x^2-1

At a critical point we require that the derivative vanish leading to the two possible outcomes:

( 1+ x/sqrt(x^2-1) )/(x +sqrt(x^2-1))+1/x^2-1 = 0

( 1- x/sqrt(x^2-1) )/(x -sqrt(x^2-1))+1/x^2-1 = 0

Solving these equations (which are independent of a), we get approximate real solutions:

x ~~ +- 1.7742

From which we can calculate the corresponding value of D.

I will return to the solution if time permits.

Jun 20, 2018

Assuming that y = g(x) ( in my view f(x) ) is the inverse, the distance is 0, everywhere.

Explanation:

Disambiguation Note:

Inversion means writing a relation y = f(x) as

x = inverse of y = f^(-1)(y),

for an x-interval, in which the relation is bijective, 1 - 1.

f is a function operator and f^(-1) is its inverse operator. So,

the successive operations f^(-1) f and ff^(-1) both

produce the multiplication unit operator 1. Also, f^(-1) f^(-1) is f.

And so, if y = f(x),

x = f^(-1)f(x) = f^(-1)(f(x)) = f^(-1)(y)

I think that is high time to do away with the calling

y = f^(-1)(x),

obtained by the swapping (x, y) to (y, x),

as the inverse.

Importantly, the graphs for both are one and the same.

Swapping x and y rotates this graph and makes it different.

I affirm that the distance is 0, as the two graphs are one and the

same. For the common graph, a = 1. The inverse had to be defined

in two pieces, x >=0 and x <= 0, as

x = ln(y+(y^2-1)^0.5) and x = - ln(y+(y^2-1)^0.5),

respectively.

Graph for y = cosh(x+1/y) = the given FCF ( Functional Continued

Fraction ) expansion as f(x):
graph{(x - ln(y+(y^2-1)^0.5))(x + ln(y+(y^2-1)^0.5))=0}