How do you calculate the average kinetic energy of the CH_4CH4 molecules in a sample of CH_4CH4 gas at 253 K and at 545 K?

1 Answer
Apr 21, 2016

The average kinetic energy K_"avg"Kavg is based off of the equipartition theorem. I have derived it here from the statistical mechanics standpoint if you wish to see it.

Suppose "CH"_4CH4 was an ideal, polyatomic molecule. Then, the only degrees of freedom it has are due to linear motion, that is, x,y,zx,y,z, and rotational motion (R_x, R_y, R_zRx,Ry,Rz).

For methane this is a decent approximation that omits vibrational degrees of freedom; I'll talk about it at the bottom of the answer.

For the equipartition theorem, we have:

\mathbf(K_"avg" = N/2nRT)Kavg=N2nRT

where:

  • NN is the number of degrees of freedom.
  • nn is the number of \mathbf("mol")mols.
  • RR is the universal gas constant, "8.314472 J/mol"cdot"K"8.314472 J/molK.
  • TT is the temperature in "K"K.

NOTE: If you include the vibrational contribution to the degrees of freedom according to the equipartition theorem ("+9"+9), you will be WAY, WAY off!

Given "1 mol"1 mol of "CH"_4CH4, we then get three linear and three rotational degrees of freedom, each of which contribute 11 to "N"N.

Thus, we have

color(blue)(K_"1,avg") = 6/2RT_1K1,avg=62RT1

= 3*8.314472*253=38.314472253

= "6310.68 J" ~~ color(blue)(6.31xx10^3 "J")=6310.68 J6.31×103J

color(blue)(K_"2,avg") = 6/2RT_2K2,avg=62RT2

= 6/2*8.314472*545=628.314472545

= "13594.2 J" ~~ color(blue)(1.36xx10^4 "J")=13594.2 J1.36×104J

rounded to three sig figs.

NOTE: This corresponds to an estimated constant-volume molar heat capacity of barC_"V,tot" ~~ 3R ~~ "24.9 J/mol"cdot"K"¯¯¯CV,tot3R24.9 J/molK, which is about 8.9%8.9% below the true value.


This is a decent approximation but could be better because methane has four vibrational modes in its IR spectrum (A_1 + E + 2T_2A1+E+2T2),.

These contribute a total of 0.2823R0.2823R to its constant-volume molar heat capacity barC_"V,tot"¯¯¯CV,tot as follows:

barC_"V,tot" = barC_"V,trans" + barC_"V,rot" + barC_"V,vib"¯¯¯CV,tot=¯¯¯CV,trans+¯¯¯CV,rot+¯¯¯CV,vib

= 3/2R + 3/2R + 0.2823R=32R+32R+0.2823R

~~ color(blue)(3.2823R)3.2823R

whereas the equipartition theorem predicts:

barC_"V,tot" = barC_"V,trans" + barC_"V,rot" + barC_"V,vib"¯¯¯CV,tot=¯¯¯CV,trans+¯¯¯CV,rot+¯¯¯CV,vib

= 3/2R + 3/2R + stackrel("omit this for ideality")(overbrace(9R)

= color(red)(stackrel("'real'")(overbrace(12R)), or color(red)(stackrel("ideal")(overbrace("3R"))

which is fairly off from the true barC_("V,tot")!


And just so you know I'm not making these numbers up, I got this information while doing a speed-of-sound in methane lab last year:

barC_(V_"vib") = Rsum_(i)^(3N-6) [g_i((theta_i)/T)^2 e^(-theta_i"/"T)/(1-e^(-theta_i"/"T))^2]
(from my lab handout)

where:

  • R is the universal gas constant.
  • g_i is the degeneracy of mode i. E is doubly degenerate and T is triply degenerate (A is unique, so g_A = 1).
  • N here is the number of atoms on "CH"_4: 5.
  • theta_i is the vibrational temperature in "K" of vibrational mode i. Those are given in Table 1 below.
  • T is temperature in "K" as usual.

barC_("V,vib") and barC_("V,tot") were calculated in Excel below at "295.15 K" (2.3469/8.314472 ~~ 0.2823).

And a summary of barC_("V,vib") from various approaches is shown below:

The takeaway is that the statistical mechanics approach was the most accurate approach.