I just want to make sure about a concept : What is 00? Usually anything divided by 0 is undefined, but a past student of mine reckons they were taught it is 1. Is there any theorem or proof of this? Thanks

5 Answers
Mar 28, 2016

Your student either mis-remembers or was mis-taught. (Both things happen.)

Explanation:

If we attempt to make 00 equal to one (by definition or whatever), then we lose our number system.

Using what we know about multiplication, we can prove that there is only one number.

If 00=1, then, using the usual definition of multiplication, we get

2×00=2×00=00=1 and also

2×00=2×1=2, so we can prove that 1=2. This is not a useful result.

In fact we can use any number x in place of 2 to show that: if 00=1 (and we keep our definition of multiplication) then x=1.

In fact any attempt to define division by 0 for any numerator will result in destroying the number system.

In fact we cannot even say that limits of the form 00 evaluate to 1 unless we are prepared to lose tangent lines and rates of change. Limits of difference quotients would all evaluate to 1.

Mar 28, 2016

00 is undefined

Explanation:

Jim has covered this quite well, so I will add little more.

Here are some spurious proofs for illustration/consideration:


"Proof" 1

xx=1 for any number x, so surely 00=1 for consistency.

Division by 0 is always undefined.


"Proof" 2

x0=1 for any number x

So xx=x1x1=x11=x0=1 for any x, in particular 0

This is a thinly disguised attempt to justify 00=1 using the convention that 00=1, just like x0=1 for any x0

Mar 29, 2016

The question asks to prove/disprove something which was never defined.

Explanation:

This is how I was taught.

The problem has been posed with the assumption that dividing by 0 is a legitimate operation.

By definition, division operation is opposite of multiplication operation. e.g.,

If c times b equals a, can be written symbolically as

c×b=a
then a divided by b equals c, can be written as

ab=c for all values of b except for b=0.
We must remember that a,bandc are unique numbers.

Division with 0 was never defined.

Moreover, the answer resides in the question itself.
Usually anything divided by 0 is undefined

and 'anything' includes all numbers including 0

The ancient Samskrit text which is treated as definition of zero also did/does not talk of division by zero.
enter image source here

Mar 31, 2016

I agree that 00 is undefined
but it raises the question of whether it is (arbitrarily) definable.

Explanation:

If division is defined as the opposite of multiplication
so that a÷b=c means c×b=a
then
XXXa÷0 for a0
is quite different from
XXXa÷0 for a=0

If a0 then there is no possible value that could be defined for c such that
XXXc×0=a
however if a=0 we could define c to be some (perhaps arbitrary) value and maintain consistency.

Sep 14, 2016

00 is undefined

Explanation:

00 is undefined..

One could explain this by saying there are 3 rules in place here.

"Zero divided by anything is equal to 0"

05=0, 025=0, 014=0 etc

"Anything divided by itself is equal to 1.

55=1, 3737=1, 1212=1 etc

"Division by 0 is not permissible/undefined"
Dividing by 0 actually gives infinity as the answer, but infinity is not a number.

So, we have 3 possible answers using valid maths concepts.

So which is it? Is00=0?, Is00=1? Is00=infinity?

No-one knows, so it best to just say that 00 is undefined.

Please refer to the link given below/