(6y)/(2y+6)+(y+18)/(3y+9)=(7y+17)/(y+3)
We can rewrite it as:-
(6y)/[2(y+3)]+(y+18)/[3(y+3)]=(7y+17)/(y+3)
=>(9y+y+18)/(3(y+3))=(7y+17)/(y+3)
Cross multiply;
=>(10y+18)(y+3) = 3(7y+17) (y+3)
=>(10y+18)(y+3)-3(7y+17) (y+3)=0
Taking (y+3) common;
=>(y+3)(10y+18-21y-51)=0
=>(y+3)(-11y-33)=0
=>-11*(y+3)*(y+3)=0
=> (y+3)^2=0
=> y+3 = 0 => color(red)(y=-3)
BUT there is a catch.
We might think that y=-3 is the solution but try to substitute this value back into the original equation i.e.
(6y)/(2y+6)+(y+18)/(3y+9)=(7y+17)/(y+3)
We find that terms in the denominator become zero.
2*(-3)+6 = -6+6=0,
3*(-3)+9=-9+9=0,
-3+3 = 0.
That means the expressions (6y)/(2y+6), (y+18)/(3y+9), (7y+17)/(y+3) become undefined ** at y=-3 since division by zero is not defined. Hence we cannot say for sure whether the left-hand-side equals the right-hand-side or not. So y=-3 is not a solution** to this equation.
Where did we go wrong?
Remember the step where we cross multiplied y+3. Cross multiplication, or in fact any kind of multiplication on both sides of the equation is allowed only when the number(s) being multiplied is/are non-zero. Therefore cross multiplication in that step is only valid if y+3!=0 or y!=-3. I.e. we are cross multiplying on the assumption that y=-3 is not a solution and even if it turns out to be a solution after solving the subsequent equations, we are going to neglect it.
therefore we neglect y=-3 and hence, the given equation has no real solution.
Just to be sure, I checked on wolfram.
