Question #27e4d
1 Answer
This is actually hard to do completely without actual data.
INITIAL GUESS
My initial ordering would be based on charge (smallest to largest):
Al3+ Mg2+ Na+ Ne F− O2− O3−
since a larger positive charge gives a larger effective nuclear charge relative to an element on the same period with a smaller positive charge, and thus a smaller ionic radius.
But we are looking way across the periodic table, and the period trend and group trend overlap.
PERIOD/GROUP TREND CONFLICTS
Recall that the atomic radius resets to be bigger due to the addition of a new quantum level
How much smaller does
The actual radii are:
53 pm (ionic radius)72 pm (ionic radius)102 pm (ionic radius)69 pm (covalent radius)133 pm (ionic radius)140 pm (ionic radius)>140 pm (ionic radius)
respectively, for the species listed at the top.
So I would have misplaced
(And I could also be wrong if the atomic radii I referenced were poorly calculated or poorly determined as well, because
The "real" order, at least based on the data I referenced, would be (from smallest to largest):
Al3+ ,rionic=53 pm Ne ,rcovalent=69 pm Mg2+ ,rionic=72 pm Na+ ,rionic=102 pm F− ,rionic=133 pm O2− ,rionic=140 pm O3− ,rionic>140 pm